Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: removed duplicate spec #38342

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

sagar-qa007
Copy link
Contributor

@sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 commented Dec 24, 2024

Description

this test steps are already covered.

Fixes # https://app.zenhub.com/workspaces/stability-pod-6690c4814e31602e25cab7fd/issues/gh/appsmithorg/appsmith/38343

Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.JS"

🔍 Cypress test results

Tip

🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12478571141
Commit: 343daa4
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.JS
Spec:


Tue, 24 Dec 2024 08:05:26 UTC

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed the end-to-end test file for JavaScript objects' on-load actions.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request involves the deletion of the JsOnLoad3_Spec.ts file, which was a Cypress end-to-end test specification for JavaScript objects' on-load actions. The file contained tests that verified API calls and data population during page load, focusing on testing the execution of asynchronous JavaScript functions and their interactions with APIs.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/OnLoadTests/JsOnLoad3_Spec.ts Entire test specification file deleted

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

skip-changelog, ok-to-test

Suggested reviewers

  • ApekshaBhosale
  • NandanAnantharamu

Poem

🧪 Farewell, test of JavaScript might,
Your APIs danced in digital light.
Deleted now, but memories remain,
Of page loads tested, without a strain.
Code's journey continues, ever bright! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 16953b8 and 343daa4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/OnLoadTests/JsOnLoad3_Spec.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ServerSide/OnLoadTests/JsOnLoad3_Spec.ts

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 added the ok-to-test Required label for CI label Dec 24, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog label Dec 24, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@NandanAnantharamu NandanAnantharamu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ok-to-test Required label for CI skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants