Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[feature-request] To add support for lambda expressions #14699

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cutiepie-10
Copy link

This is a PR for the issue #14650.
I have added the parsing of lambda expression in the CalciteSqlParser class and further continuing to tweak the code.

@cutiepie-10
Copy link
Author

Hello @maintainers,
This is not the final PR I need to add more commits.
Please help me for further progress.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 22, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 64.01%. Comparing base (59551e4) to head (243a69e).
Report is 1497 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...org/apache/pinot/sql/parsers/CalciteSqlParser.java 0.00% 10 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #14699      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     61.75%   64.01%   +2.25%     
- Complexity      207     1608    +1401     
============================================
  Files          2436     2706     +270     
  Lines        133233   149227   +15994     
  Branches      20636    22875    +2239     
============================================
+ Hits          82274    95521   +13247     
- Misses        44911    46696    +1785     
- Partials       6048     7010     +962     
Flag Coverage Δ
custom-integration1 100.00% <ø> (+99.99%) ⬆️
integration 100.00% <ø> (+99.99%) ⬆️
integration1 100.00% <ø> (+99.99%) ⬆️
integration2 0.00% <ø> (ø)
java-11 63.98% <0.00%> (+2.27%) ⬆️
java-21 63.90% <0.00%> (+2.28%) ⬆️
skip-bytebuffers-false 63.99% <0.00%> (+2.25%) ⬆️
skip-bytebuffers-true 63.88% <0.00%> (+36.15%) ⬆️
temurin 64.01% <0.00%> (+2.25%) ⬆️
unittests 64.00% <0.00%> (+2.25%) ⬆️
unittests1 56.30% <0.00%> (+9.41%) ⬆️
unittests2 34.45% <0.00%> (+6.71%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants