[MWAR-455] Allow force overwrite of read only resources in exploded war target directory #27
Conversation
… readonly, similar to ant's force option for file operations
* MWAR-455: Add option to allow forcing resources to be overwritten when they are readonly, similar to ant's force option for file operations
|
Thanks for the PR! Will look at it and run the CI... |
| * If resources should be overwritten, even if they are read only | ||
| */ | ||
| @Parameter( defaultValue = "false" ) | ||
| boolean forceOverwriteResources; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we usually add @since for new parameter and make the field private.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I can get that added to the pull request. However, based on @michael-o 's response, is that a vain exercise?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looking at the JIRA issue and the reason for this I am not convinced. It looks like a fix for a symptom with an ill-designed SCM. You should rather inquire with Perforce's today owner why it is implmented this way. I don't understand, therefore I won't consent this PR even if the code looks decent.
What about this? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48195633/prevent-perforce-from-marking-files-as-read-only
elharo
changed the title
Following this checklist to help us incorporate your
contribution quickly and easily:
for the change (usually before you start working on it). Trivial changes like typos do not
require a JIRA issue. Your pull request should address just this issue, without
pulling in other changes.
[MWAR-XXX] - Fixes bug in ApproximateQuantiles,where you replace
MWAR-XXXwith the appropriate JIRA issue. Best practiceis to use the JIRA issue title in the pull request title and in the first line of the
commit message.
mvn clean verifyto make sure basic checks pass. A more thorough check willbe performed on your pull request automatically.
mvn -Prun-its clean verify).If your pull request is about ~20 lines of code you don't need to sign an
Individual Contributor License Agreement if you are unsure
please ask on the developers list.
To make clear that you license your contribution under
the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004
you have to acknowledge this by using the following check-box.
[ X] I hereby declare this contribution to be licenced under the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004
[X ] In any other case, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.