-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 140
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
accuracy of double precision functions (binary64) #235
Comments
a new version is available, with OpenLibm 0.8.1: https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/papers/accuracy.pdf. No major change with respect to the above, except the maximal known error for "other functions" is now 4.08 ulps. |
a new version is available, still with OpenLibm 0.8.1: https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/papers/accuracy.pdf. |
a new version is available, still with OpenLibm 0.8.1: https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/papers/accuracy.pdf. |
a new version is available, still with OpenLibm 0.8.1: https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/papers/accuracy.pdf.
|
a new version is available, still with OpenLibm 0.8.1: https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/papers/accuracy.pdf. |
a new version is available, with OpenLibm 0.8.3: https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/papers/accuracy.pdf.
|
I am about to release a new update of the accuracy comparison of mathematical functions. It will be with Openlibm 0.7.5, the last release. The previous update (with Openlibm 0.7.4) is available here: https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/papers/accuracy.pdf. For double precision, in 0.7.5, there is still a large maximal error for pow (636 ulps) and tgamma (1.03e3 ulps) and huge errors for j0,j1,y0,y1 and lgamma. All other functions have a maximal known error less than 4.04 ulps.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: